The Azusa Street Revival . . . - Page 3 - Faith Forums

		Faith Forums - inthepursuitofgod.com > Theology > Debates and Discussion
The Azusa Street Revival . . .

Page 3 of 14

Last »

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Display Modes

#21 (permalink)

08-08-2007, 05:28 AM

RadLad72

Senior Member

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 240

My Mood:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Mills

Trek I really did think your education was a bit higher to understand what he was saying, but you brought your sarcasm along with Rad lad out again. I wonder why?

Not too hard to understand actually Jeff. We have similar beliefs about this topic and therefore are probably thinking along similar lines.

Rad.

Sponsored Links

#22 (permalink)

08-08-2007, 05:31 AM

Jeff Mills

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by RadLad72

Not too hard to understand actually Jeff. We have similar beliefs about this topic and therefore are probably thinking along similar lines.

Rad.

The troube with both you and trekker is that you are both coming close to receiveing a full ban for continuing to push your beliefs onto this born-again forum, insiead of truly wanting to elarn from the people here. It is reaching point where some people are getting completely sick of your running down of Pentecostals. If i receive one more complaint your gone.

#23 (permalink)

08-08-2007, 05:44 AM

RadLad72

Senior Member

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 240

My Mood:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Mills

Would you like to let us know who are complaining? We only have your word for it. Anyway, we are not putting Pentecostal people down at all. We are disagreeing with particular beliefs that Penetcostal believers have. We are using Scripture to do it, but apparently that isn't good enough.

I believe that banning us will show others how closed-minded people are that they cannot, for a second, see that other poeple's beliefs could have some merit at least.

Rad.

#24 (permalink)

08-08-2007, 05:48 AM

Jeff Mills

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by RadLad72

You see, we ALL give you TWO people verses and you just do not want to accept it. Then clear off then as you wont get any more joy here. Why do you stay? To annoy us? Because you obviously do not want to accept anything we say. Pointless. If I was you I would leg it to a site where they will all agree with you. And....be careful who you call narrow-minded. That is an attack.

#25 (permalink)

08-08-2007, 05:50 AM

RadLad72

Senior Member

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 240

My Mood:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Mills

And calling me "Saint Rad" isn't?

Rad

#26 (permalink)

08-08-2007, 05:52 AM

Jeff Mills

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by RadLad72

And calling men "Saint Rad" isn't?

Rad

There is nothing wrong with that. that is quite Biblical. I thought you said you knew the Bible better than us? The Bible says we are all saints. I don't have to wait for some pope in a long cloak to make me a saint 100 years after I die. I am one now.

Last edited by Jeff Mills : 08-08-2007 at 06:11 AM. Reason: typo

#27 (permalink)

08-08-2007, 06:26 AM

RadLad72

Senior Member

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 240

My Mood:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Mills

I think that this is quite a lame excuse for the usage of the term. We both know you were being facaetious and that is quite rude.

Yes, we are saints. The saints are those that follow the commandments and the testimony of Jesus Christ (Revelation).

Rad.

#28 (permalink)

08-08-2007, 06:44 AM

Trekker06

Senior Member

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 1,345

My Mood:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Mills

If I have ever pushed a point of view that is un-scriptural just let me know, Jeff, and I'll remove myself hopefully before you do. That might concern the Sabbath, the state of the dead, hell, eternal torment, homosexuality (based on a TRUE reading of the Bible), whatever. I'm not talking about controversial ...I'm talking about UN-scriptural.

The problem is that there is SUCH a huge misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the Bible - hence the thousands of denominations - that one man's 'truths' are another man's 'lies' and vice verse. And both get their 'truths' and 'lies' from the same book. A Christian forum should be a meeting place for open discussion on sometimes complex issues. While no one should have to tolerate offensive language and behavior and the belittling of others it SHOULD be open to one's IDEAS being challenged if need be. Whenever you are challenged Jeff you become quite nasty and I for one find that quite disconcerting. I'm talking to you now man to man and not member to moderator. Sure, you and I have a joke with one another on occasions but I am ALWAYS wary that if I get on the wrong side of you you will not hesitate to have me 'booted off' the forum, as you put it. Neither Rad nor I are bad people and we are, for the most part I think, fairly sincere Christians. Don't demonize us, Jeff.

Why don't you do the honorable thing, Jeff, and just become a regular participant on the forum like the rest of us? Both your attitude and your position of power is not the best combination. Perhaps then we won't be subjected to your threats to have us removed and we might all get along better in the bargain.

Maybe not . . .

By the way, other than Rad, Enterprise, and a couple more who have sent me some lovely PMs, do I have any more friends on the forum? If the majority would prefer to see the back of me then I probably should go.

#29 (permalink)

08-08-2007, 03:19 PM

Trinity

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trekker06

By the way, other than Rad, Enterprise, and a couple more who have sent me some lovely PMs, do I have any more friends on the forum? If the majority would prefer to see the back of me then I probably should go.

Well, Trekk. You know how I feel. I'd like to think that you and I are friends - though we frustrate each other at times.